selective focus phot of artificial human skull 
Photo by jesse orrico on Unsplash
in

Practical Steps around ChatGPT

Regardless of whether it is a demon on angel, what do we do?

What do we actually do about ChatGPT?

What do we do right now?

It’s a less exciting question than most are discussing.

Nature, one of the leading scientific journals in the world, is tackling this question head-on.

They have published clear sensible guidelines about assistance from and authorship by such systems.

  • Only humans can be listed as authors because only humans can take responsibility for their work.
  • The methods of using these AI assistants must be clearly enough described to be reviewed and replicated.

Other scientific publications are following suit.

I see this as an important first step for bringing order to the chaos.

But what are the next steps?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Written by Russell Brand

Russell has started three successful companies, one of which helped agencies of the federal government become very early adopters of open source software, long before that term was coined. His first project saved The American taxpayer 250 million dollars. In his work within federal agency, he was often called, “the arbiter of truth,” facilitating historically hostile groups and factions to effectively work together towards common goals

 

A better explanation of “starting with why”

body of water during sunset 

Mining for Molecules